Halacha on the Go

Chapter 12

General Rules of Berakhot

יב - כללי ברכות

In this chapter (13)
  1. 1. The Prohibition of a Berakha in Vain
  2. 2. An Unnecessary Berakha
  3. 3. In Cases of Doubt Regarding Berakhot, We Are Lenient
  4. 4. May One Derive Benefit When in Doubt Whether He Recited a Berakha?
  5. 5. One Hundred Berakhot
  6. 6. Rules Regarding the Text of the Berakhot
  7. 7. Two Who Eat Together – Is It Better for One to Recite the Berakha?
  8. 8. The Obligation to Answer Amen
  9. 9. Does One Fulfill One’s Obligation by Hearing through a Loudspeaker?
  10. 10. One Who Eats Something Forbidden
  11. 11. If One Recited a Berakha over Something Forbidden, Should He Eat?
  12. 12. Giving Food to Someone Who Will Not Recite a Berakha
  13. 13. The Law of One Who Errs in His Berakha
12:1

The Prohibition of a Berakha in Vain

איסור ברכה לבטלה

A person may pray to and praise God in any language he wishes and at any time he wishes, and in the course of prayers and praises he may mention His holy names; but it is forbidden to say a berakha in vain (berakha le-vatala). What is a berakha in vain? When one says a berakha where it does not belong. For example, one who recites ha-motzi without eating bread, or one who recites Birkat Ha-mazon without having eaten bread beforehand. Likewise, if he recited ha-motzi, began eating bread, and then recited ha-motzi again, since he already fulfilled his obligation with the first berakha, the second berakha is in vain. Likewise, one who ate bread and recited Birkat Ha-mazon – if he goes back and recites Birkat Ha-mazon again, his berakha will be in vain.

And although, in practice, when he said a berakha in vain he said words of praise and thanksgiving to God – for everything he said in the berakha is true and for the honor of the Blessed One – nevertheless, since the Sages instituted that the berakha be said under certain conditions and he said it where it does not belong, he has violated a rabbinic prohibition. This is similar to one who swears a “vain oath” (shevu’at shav), for instance, swearing that the heavens are the heavens: even though he did not utter a falsehood, since he used the language of an oath for a well-known fact about which there is no need to swear, he has violated a Torah prohibition, as it is stated (Shemot 20:6): “You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain.” Likewise, one who recites a berakha when he does not need to recite it has negated the purpose of the berakha; for the Sages instituted saying the sanctified text of the berakha in the situation where a person needs to thank his Creator and bless Him, and he disregarded their enactment and said the berakha in vain. However, since the enactment of the berakhot is rabbinic, one who recites them where they do not belong violates a rabbinic prohibition. There is an opinion that one who recites a berakha in vain violates a Torah prohibition.¹

If one erred and recited a berakha in vain, he should immediately say: “Barukh shem kevod malkhuto le-olam va-ed” (“Blessed be the name of His glorious kingdom forever and ever”). This provides a certain rectification, for by blessing the name of His glorious kingdom, he somewhat dispels the desecration of God’s name he committed when he said a berakha in vain. If he said “Barukh Ata Hashem” (“Blessed are You, Lord”) and remembered that he does not need to recite the berakha, he should conclude “lamdeni ḥukekha” (“teach me Your statutes”), so that it turns out he said a complete verse from Tehillim (119:12), and he has not transgressed the prohibition of a berakha in vain (SA OḤ 206:6).

Notes (1)
  1. One who utters God’s name without purpose violates a positive commandment, as it is stated (Devarim 6:13): “You shall fear the Lord your God,” and one who utters His name in vain does not fear Him (Temura 4a). But one may say praises and thanksgiving before Him and in the course of this mention His holy names (see Peninei Halakha: Likkutim I 5:16). There is a further negative prohibition against swearing a vain oath, as it is stated (Shemot 20:6): “You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold guiltless one who takes His name in vain.” One of the four types of vain oath is an oath about a known fact, for instance, swearing about the heavens that they are the heavens.
    The Sages said (Berakhot 33a): “Whoever recites an unnecessary berakha transgresses ‘You shall not take [the name of the Lord your God in vain]’” (Shemot 20:6). According to most poskim, among them Rabbeinu Tam, Rabbeinu Yona, the Rosh, Rid, and Ritva, the prohibition is rabbinic, and they based it on the Torah prohibition of a vain oath. According to the Rambam (Hilkhot Berakhot 1:15), the prohibition is from the Torah, for one who recites a berakha where it is not needed is considered as one who swears in vain. Some explain that even according to the Rambam the prohibition is rabbinic (Eliyahu Rabba, Ḥazon Ish), but most Aḥaronim hold that according to the Rambam the prohibition is from the Torah (MB 215:20; Birkat Hashem vol. 1, 1:2, n. 8).
1 of 13