The Meaning of Zimun
עניין הזימון
Three people who ate bread together are obligated to make a zimun, that is, to add an introductory berakha to Birkat Ha-mazon. To elaborate a little on the meaning of zimun, we must explain that a gathering of many people has great power: the mutual enrichment among them creates something additional, more than what each individual has. The smallest group numbers three people, and when three people eat together, beyond the benefit and pleasure they derive from the food, additional feelings are aroused in their souls; their meal takes on the status of a social event, and correspondingly their Birkat Ha-mazon must also take on a more important status. Indeed, the virtue of Birkat Ha-mazon recited with a zimun is greater than without a zimun, for through the uniting of three to bless together, a great sanctification of God’s name takes place and the honor of Heaven is increased. As it states: “Magnify the Lord with me, and let us exalt His name together” (Tehillim 34:4). Thus there is virtue in one person inviting his companions to exalt and magnify God’s name together with him. It also states: “When I proclaim the name of the Lord, ascribe greatness to our God” (Devarim 32:3) (Berakhot 45a).
There are spiritual outlooks in the world according to which eating is a shameful necessity of which one should be ashamed, and a person ought to eat alone in order to hide his disgrace. In their view, the social custom of gathering to eat together is a shameful and ugly custom that grants ritual importance to the body and its desires and destroys a person’s ability to detach himself somewhat from the shackles of physicality. But according to the Torah outlook, the body is bad only when it is disconnected from values; when the aim of eating is to receive strength, vitality, and joy for a good and meaningful life, eating is good.
However, one must be diligent about this, for just as one can elevate the aim of eating, so the desire for food can drag a person after it, make him forget his calling, and debase his life. This is the purpose of the berakhot: to remind a person of Whose food it is, and consequently of man’s place and role in the world.
When a person eats in a group, the meal is accompanied by many more feelings. Thus we find that a good meal intensifies feelings of friendship among friends and family members, and can even serve as a suitable setting for creating closeness between people who are distant. In contrast, a bad and tense meal can arouse negative feelings and intensify quarrels. Since a group meal carries greater weight, the ordinary berakhot that suffice to elevate an individual’s meal are not sufficient for a group, and therefore the group must enhance Birkat Ha-mazon through the berakha of zimun.
It should be added that the feeling of social cohesion created at a meal may serve as a substitute for holy values and thereby cause an overemphasis on the material side of life. This is the reason that when three eat together, they must say words of Torah. As R. Shimon said (Avot 3:3): “Three who ate at one table and did not say words of Torah over it are as if they ate of sacrifices to the dead, as it states: ‘For all tables are full of vomit and filth, without the Omnipresent’ (Yeshayahu 28:8). But three who ate at one table and said words of Torah over it are as if they ate from the table of the Omnipresent, blessed be He, as it states: ‘And he said to me, This is the table that is before the Lord’ (Yeḥezkel 41:22).”
If ten ate together, they gain an additional virtue: they mention God’s name in the zimun, as will be explained below (halakha 5).¹
Notes (1)
- According to the vast majority of Rishonim, zimun is rabbinic; this is the view of Rav Natronai Gaon, Rid, Ra’ah, Rashba, Meiri, and many others. So too wrote most Aḥaronim, among them Ḥayei Adam and MB 192:1. However, according to Ra’avad, the mitzva of zimun is from the Torah, and so wrote Petaḥ Ha-devir 192:4 and Ḥazon Ish 31:1. Some say that zimun with ten is from the Torah and with three is rabbinic (Mabit). See Birkat Hashem vol. 2, 6, n. 8.