Halacha on the Go

Chapter 7

The Conversion of Minors

ז – גיור קטנים

In this chapter (7)
  1. 1. The Conversion of Minors
  2. 2. Annulment of the Conversion by Protest
  3. 3. The Procedure for Converting a Minor, and His Status
  4. 4. Those Who Are Stringent About Converting a Minor Who Will Not Be Raised to Observe Mitzvot
  5. 5. Those Who Are Lenient About Converting a Minor Who Will Not Be Raised to Observe Mitzvot
  6. 6. Those Who Are Stringent Not to Circumcise the Son of a Jewish Man and a Non-Jewish Woman
  7. 7. Those Who Are Lenient to Circumcise the Son of a Jewish Man and a Non-Jewish Woman
7:1

The Conversion of Minors

גיור קטנים

A beit din can convert minors. Therefore, when parents come to convert and ask to convert their children with them, the beit din converts their children. And although conversion depends on the decision of the convert, and children who have not yet reached the age of mitzvot lack the mature judgment to make such a fateful decision, since it is in the child’s interest to be of the same religion as his parents, who are responsible for him and care for him, the beit din converts the minor on the basis of his parents’ consent (Ketubot 11a; SA 268:7).

A beit din can convert a minor even when the parents do not wish to convert themselves but want the beit din to convert their child, or when the child decided on his own initiative that he wants to convert and his parents come before the beit din to express their consent. For since accepting Judaism is, as a rule, something good and a privilege for the child, if the beit din assesses that the conversion will indeed be a privilege for him, it converts him on the authority of the beit din. For just as “one may confer a benefit on a person in his absence” (zakhin le-adam she-lo be-fanav), and accordingly one may transfer gifts to a minor and grant him things that will benefit him, so a beit din is permitted to bring a minor into the covenant with God when in its assessment this is for the minor’s good.

Similarly, in times and places where there were abandoned children, if such a child came and asked to convert, the beit din could convert him. Likewise, when Jews wish to adopt an abandoned infant and ask to convert him, since it is a privilege to be Jewish, and it is also in the infant’s interest to be Jewish like his adoptive parents, the beit din may accede to their request and convert the child (Shevet Mi-Yehuda vol. 2, YD 29; Mishpetei Shaul 1, sha’ar 4, 38).

However, the beit din should not seek out children in order to convert them, and all the more so one should not convert children against their will. Even where Jews rule, non-Jewish children are not converted by force against their will or against the will of their parents. And if a child was converted against his will, his conversion is void (Baḥ and Shakh 268:16).¹

In the case of a child of an intermarriage, when the Jewish father wants to convert his child and the non-Jewish mother objects, many say that we listen to the mother, for since the child is a non-Jew, according to halakha the father is not considered his father. And some say that the father too has the authority to bring him [for conversion]; however, if the mother objects to his conversion, it is often preferable not to convert him, for as a result of her objection to his conversion she will insist on raising him to hate Judaism.²

Notes (2)
  1. Ketubot 11a: “Rav Huna said: A minor convert is immersed on the authority of the beit din,” and the Gemara explained that the beit din converts him because the conversion is a privilege for him. True, in the eyes of an adult non-Jew conversion is not always considered a privilege, because he has already tasted the taste of sin, and if he converts he will have to refrain from transgressions his heart desires. But the minor has not yet been enticed by his inclination, and presumably wants to merit being Jewish. It is further explained in the Gemara that when a convert converts with his children, it is clear that “they are content with what their father does.” And there is no difference whether the father or the mother brings them to convert with them (Rashba and Ritva ad loc.). But when the minor does not convert with one of his parents, the beit din becomes like a father to him and decides on his conversion. Also when the child has understanding and asks to convert, the beit din may convert him. So wrote the Ritva and the Shita Mekubetzet in the name of the Ra’ah (Ketubot 11a). And so it was ruled in SA 268:7, and so wrote the Shakh 16, based on the Mordekhai in the name of the Ravya, and the Baḥ. Likewise, an abandoned infant may be converted (Piskei Rid, Ketubot 11a). But if a non-Jewish child was converted against his will, his conversion is void (Mordekhai, Yevamot §40, in the name of the Ravya). And so wrote the Baḥ and Shakh 268:16. And it seems that even when the parents convert, if the child expresses opposition to converting, he is not converted. And if he was converted against his will, it seems that according to the Ḥatam Sofer and those who follow him, cited in note 4, his conversion is valid, and according to the other poskim his conversion is void.
  2. Those who hold that the father has no authority: Tosafot Yom Tov on Kiddushin 3:12; Kiryat Ḥana David vol. 2, YD 37; Pri Ha-sadeh 1:43; Ish Matzli’aḥ vol. 2, YD 39. Those who hold that he has authority: Mateh Levi YD 54:2; Divrei Malkiel 6:19; Piskei Uziel 64. See Masoret Ha-giyur 13:25-26.
1 of 7